Several AI assistants like Claude, ChatGPT, Grok, Cursor and Antigravity, working together with you, so you can trust what comes back.
GENIUSism works with the AI platforms you already use. Any of them can lead the team, and your work goes only where it already goes. Nothing passes through us.
An AI working alone sounds sure of everything. It has no one to check its work, and no one to debate with.
Right and wrong arrive in the same voice, at the same speed.
Then answers, fluently, a question you didn't ask.
Nothing checks it before you do. You are the review step.
Serious work already runs this way. A doctor gets a second opinion. A contract gets a reviewer. A story gets an editor.
GENIUSism gives your AI the same thing: a small team of AI assistants from different companies (Claude, ChatGPT, Grok and others), each playing a role, working the problem through together — and telling you if anyone still disagrees. Second opinion, then third, fourth and fifth, all in the same room.
Real run: one AI cited a branch of philosophy. Two others checked. It doesn't exist.
The Smart Brief. Quick question: no questions. Client email: two. Legal: a few about what matters most to you.
Agreement isn't proof. You see where the proof is thin.
Fact-checking is one team member's job. The team also plans, drafts, plays your audience, and asks you questions when it needs to.
The short version: other tools do the work and hand it over. GENIUSism has several AIs check each other's work, with you involved, before you rely on it.
One person gets the same team a company does. You don't need to be technical, and you don't need to know how to prompt. You describe the job the way you'd brief a sharp colleague.
Attorneys, consultants, accountants, advisors. Anything a client will read.
Posts, pages, pitches. Find the claim that would get quoted back at you.
Pricing, policies, a difficult customer email, a hire.
Every citation checked. The ones it couldn't find, flagged.
A resume, a cover letter, an offer to weigh. Read by a hiring manager, a recruiter, and a skeptic before you send it.
A job offer, a lease, a big purchase, a letter you need to understand.
Client-facing work at volume, with a reviewer on every piece.
Pricing, policy, anything a customer or regulator will read.
One AI writes the code. A different one has to accept it.
Where “the AI said so” isn't good enough.
A run takes 8–20 minutes and uses your own AI accounts, so it costs about what those accounts charge for the work. There is no per-run fee to us; GENIUSism’s own pricing comes with the release.
Same six minds. Name the mission and each one takes a role, or sits it out. The lead cannot approve its own work.
Pick one below to see who suits up.
No transcript to read. A short, plain-language result you can act on today, with the facts already checked. Where the team still disagreed, you see why, in a line each.
The email is written. Every date and number in it was checked against your ticket history before you saw it.
Offering the credit before they ask might make the miss look bigger than it is. You may want to save it for the call.
The Team Asks, Plans & Debates. You decide.
The team doesn't just answer. They work the problem in rounds — and if one of them still disagrees, they say so.
The AI you choose is your Strategy Genius, the lead. The lead cannot approve its own work. For each job it gathers a specialized team around itself, and the team changes with the job. Keep a fixed roster, swap one teammate, or change the whole lineup. Your call every time.
Someone's job is to disagree, and say why.
Finds what would get quoted back at you.
AI-generated audience perspectives — simulated, not research with real people.
Builds it with you, step by step.
One writes. Another reviews it with fresh eyes.
Roles named, people not. Each of these was a real job, run by one person, in an afternoon.
Ask us anything else through the waiting list.
A set of tools, wrapped up as one product, that gets the AI assistants you already use, Claude, ChatGPT, Grok, Cursor, Google's Antigravity and others, working together with you on a problem, from the first question to the finished result: a decision, a draft, a plan, or a working thing.
No, and that's the point. An agent does the work unattended and tells you when it's done. GENIUSism is the check on that: several different AIs review the work against clear rules, and you stay in the loop at the moments that matter. You could even run one behind the other: the agent does the job, GENIUSism decides whether it's right.
No. It works alongside Claude, ChatGPT, Grok, Cursor, Antigravity and others, and any of them can lead. Think of it as the team around them, not a replacement for any of them.
No. Start with the ones you have; any of them can lead the team. Each additional AI you already use joins in, and it isn't limited to the five named here: almost any AI can join, including ones running on your own computer. More of them means more perspectives, but even two is better than one.
We don’t. Your work does leave your computer, the same way it does when you use those apps today: the AIs on the team receive it from the accounts you signed in with, under those services’ terms, and from no one else. GENIUSism has no server in the middle, so nothing passes through us and nothing is stored by us. The run itself, and the record of what was checked and who raised what, is saved on your own computer.
Fact-checking is one role. The team also plans, drafts, takes the other side, plays your audience, reviews code, and asks you questions when it needs them. What comes back is work you can use, and you keep going with it until the problem is solved.
Both. A solo attorney, a freelancer, a student, or a small-business owner gets the same team a company does.
The way a good team works. Each AI takes a role: lead, researcher, reviewer, fact-checker, customer's voice. They draft, respond to each other with reasons, revise, and agree, and where they don't, they say so. You approve the team first and make the final call.
If one point stays open, the run ends with that point recorded underneath the answer, with who raised it. You decide. It never picks a side for you.
Two things, and you already pay for one of them. First, your AI accounts. GENIUSism runs on the Claude, ChatGPT, Grok, Cursor and Antigravity plans you already have, so that part costs whatever those plans cost you today. Any one of them is enough to start, and any mix works. Some examples at September 2026 prices: three free accounts (Claude, ChatGPT, Google) is enough to try it, with tight usage limits. Claude Pro, ChatGPT Plus and Google AI Pro together are about $60 a month, and that's where most people start. All five platforms on their standard paid plans are around $190 a month. Every platform on its top tier is around $1,150 a month for one person. A run uses those plans the way a long, careful conversation would, so it's for the things that matter. Second, GENIUSism itself: pricing will be announced with the release, and the waiting list hears first. There is no separate per-run fee to us, and we never bill you for the AI services.
Usually 8 to 20 minutes. Proposing the team is instant; the work takes as long as the slowest AI on it. You can start several jobs and go do something else.
A Mac or Windows computer and at least one AI account you already have. More accounts mean more perspectives on the team.
Yes. A lease, a job offer, a big purchase, a hard letter. Anything with trade-offs where you'd want every side considered.
An -ism is a way of working. The genius isn't any one AI. It's the room: different minds, human and AI, working together.
Different minds, human and AI, working together. That's GENIUSism.